Today’s New York Times has an article on extended service warranties, and the concomitant dilemma faced by gadgetmaniacs everywhere. And, that dilemma is the question of whether or not to pay an extra ten to thirty percent of a gadget’s purchase price in order to extend the regular warranty by a few years. The article tries to present a balanced approach, but seems to side with Consumer Reports, who suggest that buyers should generally avoid these service contracts. Interestingly, CR makes 3 exceptions to their no-extended-warranty rule, in the case of notebook computers, treadmills and plasma TV’s. To Buy or Not to Buy: The Quandary of Warranties - NYT August 27, 2005
Related posts:
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
I agree about avoiding extended warranties. In a few years your gadget will probably be almost obsolete anyway, and you should be able to buy a new one pretty cheap.
Yeah, sometimes you just gotta take some chances in life and go warranty-less.
Treadmills seems like an odd choice to include in the list of warranty-worthy products. Maybe they break often.