http://mail2web.com/blog/2006/02/cell-phone-radiation-levels/ Your source for mobile device, smartphone, tablet and email information Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:17:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 http://mail2web.com/blog/2006/02/cell-phone-radiation-levels/comment-page-1/#comment-354385 HC5 Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:32:39 +0000 http://mail2web.com/blog/?p=2164#comment-354385 I still feel concerned about this issue from time to time, although I am a bit of a scaredy-cat to begin with. I still feel concerned about this issue from time to time, although I am a bit of a scaredy-cat to begin with.

]]> http://mail2web.com/blog/2006/02/cell-phone-radiation-levels/comment-page-1/#comment-203040 FieldODreams Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:20:32 +0000 http://mail2web.com/blog/?p=2164#comment-203040 Yes, don't trust anything named Wymsey! It would be convenient if you could cook eggs with your phone, though. Yes, don’t trust anything named Wymsey! It would be convenient if you could cook eggs with your phone, though.

]]> http://mail2web.com/blog/2006/02/cell-phone-radiation-levels/comment-page-1/#comment-18672 Biopro Fri, 29 May 2009 00:30:34 +0000 http://mail2web.com/blog/?p=2164#comment-18672 From my understanding, most of the problems being associated with cell phone radiation have to do with non-thermal (non-heating) effects. So the SAR value does not do much. The FCC limit for public exposure from cellular telephones is an SAR level of 1.6 watts per kilogram (1.6 W/kg). But several studies have shown that biological effects, including those occurring at levels way below the current SAR standards, are non-thermal in nature. Some of these effects include DNA damage, leakage in the blood-brain barrier, changes in brainwave patterns (as measured by eeg), and others. The culprit seems to lie in the nature and structure of the radiofrequency itself, which causes a disruption in the way the body's cells communicate. In time, this continuous disruption can lead to cellular dysfunction of one form or another. From my understanding, most of the problems being associated with cell phone radiation have to do with non-thermal (non-heating) effects. So the SAR value does not do much. The FCC limit for public exposure from cellular telephones is an SAR level of 1.6 watts per kilogram (1.6 W/kg). But several studies have shown that biological effects, including those occurring at levels way below the current SAR standards, are non-thermal in nature. Some of these effects include DNA damage, leakage in the blood-brain barrier, changes in brainwave patterns (as measured by eeg), and others. The culprit seems to lie in the nature and structure of the radiofrequency itself, which causes a disruption in the way the body’s cells communicate. In time, this continuous disruption can lead to cellular dysfunction of one form or another.

]]>